Amid continuing individual attacks on religious minorities, and in the wake of the five years of unchecked large-scale attacks between 1999 and 2003, which has barely begun to be punished, opinions are divided as to how this legacy can be overcome. "This issue will have to be dealt with as a matter of justice and of nation-building," Baptist leader Bishop Malkhaz Songulashvili told Forum 18 from the capital Tbilisi [T'bilisi] on 14 January. "If it is not done now, it will still be festering five years on. How this violence started, how it developed and who organised it has to be known. This is the only way the situation can be changed and the terrible legacy overcome."
Giorgi Khutsishvili of the Tbilisi-based International Centre on Conflict and Negotiation (ICCN), which long campaigned for an end to religious violence, agrees. "Reconciliation comes after the most painful moment," he told Forum 18 from Tbilisi on 17 January. "Only when all those responsible – including the organisers - are brought to trial and they plead guilty can reconciliation start." He complained that one of the most visible ring-leaders of the attacks – Fr Basil Mkalavishvili, a priest under the jurisdiction of Greek Old Calendarist bishop Metropolitan Cyprian of Oropos and Fili, is still maintaining his innocence at his trial with six associates in Tbilisi. Only two of the accused in this trial are being charged for their part in religious violence, the other five – who also took part in religious violence - being on trial for resisting arrest only.
Only three other trials have been completed of those responsible for taking part in the violence, with all seven defendants receiving only suspended sentences. Khutsishvili maintains that although courts should ideally be independent, without strong signals from politicians that religious violence is unacceptable such mild sentences will remain the norm. "Verdicts still depend on political will. The authorities always bear in mind that the Orthodox religion should be treated carefully, and will try to avoid trials over the religious violence."
He believes that without punishment for those responsible for the violence, society's intolerance of non-Orthodox faiths will persist and their rights will continue to be restricted. "Society will continue to think that violence in the name of Orthodoxy is more excusable than ordinary crime," he told Forum 18.
"Justice for the victims of the violence is part of the solution to current religious freedom problems still facing minority faiths," Sozar Subari (Subeliani), a former human rights activist with the Tbilisi-based Liberty Institute who has been the country's ombudsman for the past three months, told Forum 18 from Tbilisi on 24 January. "All those who took part in the violence against religious minorities should get what they deserve – so that people know what happened." He puts the number of those who should be tried at "maybe dozens".
Subari says that although major violence against religious minorities has ceased, threats continue and minority faiths are still unable to build places of worship. "The new government ordered this violence to stop, but it doesn't mean problems stopped," he told Forum 18. "I often meet believers and they constantly complain of problems. This is the most important human rights issue facing Georgia. A person cannot exist if they cannot express their faith."
However, Bishop Songulashvili believes the Georgian authorities are "not ready" yet to launch a thorough investigation into who initiated and organised the violence. "Such an investigation would end up at the Georgian Orthodox Patriarchate, and no-one wants to see that," he asserted. He also believes the violence – which saw nearly 200 attacks on Baptists, Pentecostals, True Orthodox, Catholics and Jehovah's Witnesses over the five-year period – was ordered by the senior political leadership. "I believe the law-enforcement ministers, the entire government and even the then-president Eduard Shevardnadze were involved, though I can't prove any of this."
Ombudsman Subari was reluctant to pinpoint the former president as the initiator, but told Forum 18 he believed the violence had the support of Shevardnadze and the law-enforcement ministers. "Shevardnadze and his government could have ended the violence in ten minutes." Khutsishvili of the ICCN is also unsure as to who initiated the violence, though he too believes people in government and in parliament – including the outspoken former parliamentary deputy Guram Sharadze – were behind it. "Some have alleged that it might have come from Shevardnadze who was trying to strengthen his position, but I think this goes too far," he maintained.
Forum 18 contacted Shevardnadze's aides to request an interview, but they declined on the former president's behalf. Forum 18 was thus unable to ask Shevardnadze whether he had indeed been involved in initiating or encouraging the violence, or whether he believed he had taken sufficient steps before he was ousted in a popular revolt in November 2003 to stop the violence and prosecute those responsible.
But leaping to Shevardnadze's defence was Petre Mamradze, head of the state chancellery when Shevardnadze was president and now head of the renamed government chancellery under new president Mikeil Saakashvili. "You cannot blame Shevardnadze - the situation was very difficult then," he told Forum 18 from Tbilisi on 14 January. "But in my presence he spoke out strongly against religious violence and attended an ecumenical service at the Baptist church in Tbilisi." He claimed Georgian television stations suppressed the president's remarks against the religious violence as such sentiment was "not popular" then.
"There was no law and order then, and the police weren't fulfilling orders from above," Mamradze also claimed. "Ninety percent of police officers had great sympathy for those attacking religious minorities."
Zurab Tskhovrebadze, spokesman for the Georgian Orthodox Patriarchate, resolutely rejected any suggestion that the patriarchate had backed the violence. "We didn't take part in the violence," he asserted to Forum 18 from Tbilisi on 24 January, wrongly claiming that the vast majority of attacks had been carried out by Mkalavishvili, who was defrocked by the patriarchate in 1996. However, numerous witnesses from a variety of faiths – as well as human rights figures like Subari - have identified serving clergy of the patriarchate as having personally organised and participated in physical attacks on minority faiths.
"Maybe there were a few individual cases," Tskhovrebadze conceded, before blaming "the people" for the violence. "The people were angered that sects were trying to convert them from their traditional faith and acted aggressively. But this violence was not official Patriarchate policy and was not organised by the Patriarchate." He also blamed "certain political forces" – which he declined to identify – for organising the violence. "Perhaps they wanted to distract people's attention by using this issue." He declined to speculate on how far Shevardnadze and the power ministries might have been involved.
Tskhovrebadze refused to say how many people he believed should now be before the courts to face charges of organising or participating in such attacks, insisting it is a matter for the prosecutor's office.
He also maintained that now trials are underway, the issue of the religious violence is no longer current. "After the government changed the situation changed for the better and there is no violence," he told Forum 18. "The US State Department has recognised this." On being told of the mob attacks in late 2004 on Baptists in eastern Georgia (see F18News 14 January 2005 http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=489) he conceded there might be "individual cases".
Tskhovrebadze believes the current trials, the adoption of a law on religion that would allow non-Patriarchate faiths to gain legal status and "greater dialogue" between the Patriarchate and other faiths will resolve the issue. "The Patriarchate is ready for such dialogue."
Incidents of violence against religious minorities involving Orthodox priests have continued.
While welcoming the three trials that have been completed so far and the two further trials underway, the Jehovah's Witnesses – who suffered the vast majority of the attacks in the five-year reign of terror – declined to give Forum 18 any comment on what steps they believe the government should take to overcome the legacy of violence. "Everyone must act in accordance with the law," their lawyer Manuchar Tsimintia told Forum 18 from Tbilisi on 17 January. "If the response to any incident is in accordance with the law, that will be an adequate reaction."
Bishop Songulashvili argues that Mkalavishvili and his associates were only "small fry" who carried out attacks on others' orders and that the instigators behind the violence have yet to face justice. "I would rather see the small fry confess what they have done and be released, and not cover up for the real instigators," he told Forum 18. "Otherwise it will leave the general public with the view that it was only those who actually carried out the attacks who were responsible."
The bishop's dramatic offer of reconciliation to Mkalavishvili in the courtroom last November provoked controversy among those who wanted a heavy sentence. But Songulashvili insisted that he believed Mkalavishvili's confession to him was sincere. "I have no reason to doubt it," he told Forum 18.
Backing this stance is another victim Pastor Nikolai Kalutsky, whose home was used for his Pentecostal church's worship services before mob violence led by local Patriarchate priest Fr David Isakadze put a stop to it. "Just as the Baptists were ready to pardon their attackers, we too should act in a Christian way," he told Forum 18 from Tbilisi on 13 January. "Christ teaches us to forgive - that's why we're not demanding the prosecution of those who attacked us." Kalutsky nevertheless believes courts have the responsibility to try the perpetrators. He maintains that believers who cannot meet freely for worship – like his church - should insist on their constitutional rights.
Bishop Songulashvili supports holding a South African-style Truth and Reconciliation Commission on the lines of the one that investigated apartheid-era crimes. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission was established in South Africa in 1995 and heard testimony from officials involved in apartheid-era crimes – who could receive amnesty in exchange for full and frank admission of guilt – and victims – who could receive support and reparation – as a way of overcoming what the commission's website describes as "violence and human rights abuses from all sides" during apartheid rule (http://www.doj.gov.za/trc). Similar commissions have been set up in Peru, Guatemala, Haiti and in other countries which have suffered major unpunished human rights violations.
Some support for such a commission in Georgia comes from the ombudsman. "It's the first time I have heard this proposal, but it is a good idea," Subari told Forum 18.
Petre Mamradze, a senior official under former President Shevardnadze who is now head of the government chancellery, argued that the situation had changed so radically since President Saakashvili took power a year ago that a Truth and Reconciliation Commission was "not necessary". "I hope now there is greater law and order and the political will to prosecute those responsible." But he conceded that it will be hard for the police to find admissible evidence against those who initiated the violence, especially the senior organisers.